British victory in the Indian Mutiny and subsequent transfer of power to the British Government led to great British investment in Indian agriculture and industry.
What are the positive effects of British rule in India?
Positive And Negative Effects Of British Rule In India
- Positive Impact of British Rule In India. British rule did introduce new job opportunities to India. ...
- Negative impact of British rule in India. When Britain took over, they forced local governments to import goods rather than create their own. ...
- Takeaways on British Rule in India. ...
What was a positive effect of British rule in India?
What positives did the British bring to India?
- English language. The reason they taught English to the Indians was to have an ease of administration.
- Indian Railways.
- Army.
- Vaccination.
- Social reforms.
- India census.
- Surveying India.
What are the disadvantages of British rule in India?
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
- British Rule in India. India was one of the richest countries till the time of British rule in the early 17th Century . ...
- Impact of British Rule in India. ...
- The British Raj: The Rule Of The British Empire In India. ...
- Advantages and disadvantages of the literal rule. ...
- Benefits of the British Rule in India. ...
Was the British rule good or bad for India?
Without British rule, the nation of India may not even exist today. India was an essential part of the British empire. This fact granted them protection against their traditional enemies like Persia, Afghanistan, and other western countries like France that would jump at the chance to take over. British rule was a deterrent to outside aggressors.
Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses
The Benefits of British Rule. (2017, Mar 21). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/the-benefits-of-british-rule/
Cite this page
The Benefits of British Rule. (2017, Mar 21). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/the-benefits-of-british-rule/
What were the major contributions of the British to India?
5. Social reforms. Perhaps the biggest contribution of British in India was removal of social practices like Sati, child marriage, untouchability. Not only they banned such cruel inhumane practices, they also promoted a widow’s remarriage. Just imagine what India would be if such practices still existed.
What was the main intention of the British?
The main intention of the Britishers was to rule India, get as much benefits as possible from the country and its people. Most people think that the British did only harm to the Indian culture, they drained the Indian economy, they looted the nation, This is very much true, however they also did some good things here, ...
What was the pride and honor of India?
The pride and honor of our nation, the Indian army, was formed in the British era. The culture, discipline, and a lot of the army practices that still persist belong to the pre-independence era. 4. Vaccination. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Smallpox spread as an epidemic in India, and due to lack of sanitary knowledge among ...
What was the first major motion against the British Raj?
With the coming of the British Eastern India Company and the Battle of Plassey in 1757, the Mughal Dynasty faded away marking the start of formal British rule in India. The Indian Rebellion of 1857 sometimes appears as the first main motion against British Raj.
How did the language help us?
The language helped in improving our knowledge and thought process, it’s all because of English that we could read and appreciate some of the most famous literary works of the world. 2. Indian Railways. The founding stone of one of the largest railway networks in the world was laid by the British.
Why did the Indians learn English?
English language. The reason they taught English to the Indians was to have an ease of administration. However this influenced the popularity of the regional languages. But whatever one says, English language opened the doors of the world for us.
When did the British start a survey of India?
They set up the department of Geographical Survey of India in 1851, the institution surveyed villages, cities, and made maps of India. Many places use the same maps which were made during the British time. Using many advanced surveying instruments, the British surveyed every inch of the India and created maps.
How did India contribute to the British Empire?
The contribution of India towards the British Empire in terms of providing essential raw materials, troops and a pool of native labour prepared to go any where in the world was unsurpassed. It is possible to argue that most of the remaining colonies, excepting the dominions, cost much more than they gave the Empire and Britain could well have done without them. However once Britain had decided earlier in the century to become a trading nation and to import food and raw materials in return for British manufactured goods, it was inevitable that Britain would establish an empire. By 1914 the British Empire extended over 24% of the world’s territory and included 23% of the world’s population. That the British Empire was able to expand to the extent it did would not have been possible without India.
Why did Britain become dependent on India?
Britain became dependent upon India. The British motive for being in India was not an exercise in altruism. Although the mission to improve and civilise had become an important justification for the expansion of empire in the late c19th, it was the economic benefits provided that were important for Britain. The British economy had become ...
What was the success of the British Empire based on?
The success of the British Empire was based on India. In his book ‘The Rise and Fall of the British Empire’ Lawrence James describes the India of the c18th and c19th centuries as a miracle for the way that less than 200,000 British soldiers and administrators ruled over a land of 250 million people. India was also described as the ‘Jewel in the Crown’ for it was certainly the most important territory in the Empire in the late c19th. It underpinned the British economy and the Indian army played a crucial part in defending the empire throughout the world. The soldiers and administrators who went there lived a life that was harsh in the sense that the climate, and culture were quite alien but going to India provided opportunities for economic and social advancement. Those who went often came back to a country that had little interest in what they had done with their lives, and often had difficulty settling down to quiet retirement. India conveyed though elements of mystery and glamour to people in England and images of India as brought to the English nation by painters and writers had a huge influence on English life. That Britain could dominate such a land gave Britain much prestige and as British pre-eminence declined in the last quarter of the c19th, there was always India to demonstrate that Britain was still a power to be reckoned with. By 1914, it was generally agreed in Britain that Britain needed India, and India benefitted from what Britain did to improve India.
Why did Herbert Edwardes justify the British presence in India?
To justify the British presence in India, the land and its people were increasingly portrayed as ignorant, barbaric and a land in chaos and the British were there to bring peace, stability and material progress.
Why was there contempt for Indian religious customs?
There was universal contempt for Indian religious customs as campaigns were undertaken against religious rituals which offended the sensibilities of the British like thugge and suttee. Company employees were asked to disassociate themselves from Hindu ceremonies and involvement with Hindu temples.
What were the two major events that led to the economic growth of India?
The first was the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and the second the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869.
Why was the Indian army important to the British?
Under the East India Company, British officers were trained at a military College near Croydon who were then sent to India to command Indian sepoys. Altogether the Indian Army consisted in 1857 on the eve of the Rebellion of 45,000 European soldiers of the British regular army and 232,000 native soldiers. Of these 160,000 men were based in the Bengal presidency. Between 1838 and 1920 the Indian army was used outside India on nineteen occasions: in China in 1839, 1856 and 1859, in Persia in 1856, in Ethiopia in 1867, in Afghanistan in 1878, in Egypt in 1882, in Burma in 1885, in Nyasaland in 1893, in Sudan in 1896 and in Uganda in 1896. The Indian army was therefore important as providing a strategic reserve for Britain for its colonial wars. In addition, Sikh police were used in Hong Kong, Singapore, Tientsin and Nyasaland. Without this force of men Britain would not have been able to deal with the many colonial conflicts that had to be fought to deal with local resistance to British rule.
Positive effects of british rule in india?
Positive Impact: Some positive impact of the British rule in India were the introduction of the railways, post and telegraph system for masses, introduction of Western sceinces and the English language.
What are the positive and negative effects of British rule in India?
What were the positives and negative effects of British rule on Indians? Positive: Improved transport, Farming methods, order justice, and education. Negative: Exploitation, destruction of local industry, deforestation, and famine.
What were some of the benefits of British rule?
What were the benefits of the British rule for the Indians? It brought order and stability to the Indian society which had been badly divided by civil war. It also led to a honest & efficient government.
How did India benefit from the British Empire?
As well as spices, jewels and textiles, India had a huge population. They regimented India’s manpower as the backbone of their military power. Indian troops helped the British control their empire, and they played a key role in fighting for Britain right up to the 20th century.
How has Britain ruined India?
The British took thriving industries — like textiles, shipbuilding, and steel — and destroyed them through violence, taxes, import tariffs, and imposing their exports and products on the back of the Indian consumer.
Why did Britain give up India?
During World War Two, the British had mobilised India’s resources for their imperial war effort. They crushed the attempt of Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress to force them to ‘ quit India ‘ in 1942. For this reason, Britain was desperate to keep India (and its army) united.
What were some negative impacts of British rule for India?
British rule, however, was mostly devastating for Indians: its mercantile system of trade ruined indigenous economies and its cash-crop policies wreaked havoc on India’s environment and left its population vulnerable to famines, which killed millions in the late 19th century.
Why did the British take control of India?
The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. The British were very effective at infiltrating these states and gradually taking control.
How much of India did Britain take from India?
On the other hand, research suggests that from about 1870 to 1930 Britain took about 1% of India's wealth per year. This was much less than the French, Dutch and Germans took from their lands. The British invested about £400 million in the same period.
How many Indians did the British rule during the Raj?
During this period a tiny number of British officials and troops (about 20,000 in all) ruled over 300 million Indians. This was often seen as evidence that most Indians accepted and even approved of British rule.
What was the largest rebellion against British rule?
It was known in Britain as the Indian Mutiny. This was because it began with a rebellion by Indian troops (sepoys) serving in the army of the British East India Company. British rule in India was handled by the East India Company.
Why did India start importing food under British rule?
India actually started importing food under British rule, because Indians were growing 'cash crops' like cotton and tea to be sent to Britain. It is extremely important not to forget the terrible famines that devastated India. These were partly the result of weather, but partly caused by British policies.
What is the most controversial aspect of the British Empire?
The rule of the British in India is possibly the most controversial and the most hotly debated aspect of the history of the British empire. Admirers of British rule point to the economic developments, the legal and administrative system, the fact that India became the centre of world politics. Critics of British rule generally point out that all ...
Why do Indian historians dislike the term "mutiny"?
Indian historians dislike the term 'mutiny' because it suggests that only Indian troops were involved. In fact, once some of the Indian troops did revolt, the rebellion against British rule spread rapidly and involved many local Indian leaders who had a wide range of complaints against British rule.
How did the British conquest of India differ from all previous foreign conquests?
ADVERTISEMENTS: The previous conquerors had overthrown Indian political powers, but had made no basic changes in the country’s economic structure; they had gradually become a part of Indian life, political as well as economic.
How did British policy affect Indian textiles?
Thus British policy artificially restricted and slowed down the growth of Indian industries.
How much did land revenue increase in 1857?
Even though the land revenue demand went on increasing year after year—it increased from Rs. 15.3 crore in 1857—58 to Rs. 35.8 crore in 1936—37—the proportion of the total produce taken as land revenue tended to decline, especially in the twentieth century as the prices rose and production increased.
Why did India's handicraft industry collapse?
This collapse was caused largely by competition with the cheaper imported machine made goods from Britain.
How did the railways help the British?
The railways enabled British manufactures to reach and uproot the traditional industries in the remotest villages of the country . As the American writer, D.H. Buchanan, has put it, “The armour of the isolated self-sufficient village was pierced by the steel rail, and its life blood ebbed away.”.
What cities were depopulated by the British?
Cities which had withstood the ravages of war and plunder failed to survive British conquest. Dhaka, Surat, Murshidabad and many other populous and flourishing industrial centres were depopulated and laid waste. By the end of the nineteenth century, urban population formed barely 10 per cent of the total population.
What did change of rulers mean?
Change of rulers had merely meant change in the personnel of those who appropriated the peasant’s surplus. But the British conquerors were entirely different. They totally disrupted the traditional structure of the Indian economy. Moreover, they never became an integral part of Indian life.
